.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Sutton and District Referees Society

Please feel free to participate either posting helpful facts and information or posting questions to other members.


Google
 
Web suttonreferees.blogspot.com

Monday, January 30, 2006

Bangers and Mash Night

Epsom and District Referees Society

Chairman - Kevin Merchant
67 Northcroft Avenue
West Ewell
Surrey
KT19 9SZ
-----
Secretary - Ian Lamont
123 Bletchingley Road
Merstham
Surrey
RH1 3QG
01737 645670
ilamontnews@hotmail.com
-----

January 13 2006

Bangers and Mash Night

Dear Referees Societies and Associations

Epsom and District Referees Society is holding its annual Bangers and Mash night on Friday February 24 at 7.30pm at Cheam Sports Club, Peaches Close.

Enjoy Epsom's famed three-course annual gathering with a beer and a few jokes.

Please make your bookings for tickets, priced £10 per person, through Ian Hart (ian.hart@surreycc.gov.uk, 07968834336).

There will be a raffle and a cash bar.

We would be delighted to see you there.

Ian Lamont
EDRS Secretary

Misconduct Reports on-line

Dear Referee

We have been made aware that there was a problem with the on-line report form some months ago, which has since been rectified by the Football Association.

This caused forms to be produced to County Associations in odd formats.

Some forms are still being sent to us in these peciliar formats and the Football Association's view is that some referees may have saved the original form and are still using it rather than downloading a new form each time.

Can I ask if you send reports in on-line, that you use a new form each time. We can then monitor the problem and at least eliminate one possible cause. Secondly, please be aware that the acknowledging of these on-line reports is also subject to enhancement.

Currently, a paper acknowledgemnt may be sent out with fewer cases listed than sent in. Usually it will be one less, e.g. if you send in 4 cases the acknowledgemnt will show 3 cases. I apologise for both of these bugs which are being investigated by the FA.

Ray Ward
County Secretary

Friday, January 27, 2006

JEWELLERY - TAKE IT ALL OFF!

Perth Glory striker Damien Mori recently agreed to have his wedding ring cut off his finger after he had not been allowed to take the field in an Australian A-League game the day before.

In accordance with A-League Rules, Mori was told to remove the ring by FIFA referee Mark Shield prior to kick-off for his side's match against Melbourne.

The 35-year-old was unable to do so, even drawing blood as he and English coach Steve McMahon attempted to remove it whilst being filmed by the TV company covering the match.

Mori had not been able to remove his wedding ring ever since his finger was fractured and the swelling at the joint made it impossible to be removed.

Perth began the match with 10 men before Mori was replaced by former England international, Brian Deane , in the fifth minute.

Deane scored his first goal for the club in Perth 's 2-1 victory.

GOAL LINE TECHNOLOGY NOT ALL IT MAKES OUT TO BE!

The 2005 FIFA U-17 World Championships in Peru, were used to test a new piece of equipment invented by adidas, Cairos and the Fraunhofer-Institut in Germany to indicate to the referee whether or not the ball has crossed the goal line for a goal and whether the ball has gone out of play at the touchline.

The results seem to have been less than the outstanding success hoped for and must raise questions whether such unproven technology can be introduced for the FIFA World Cup in 2006, although it will be tested again, with some modifications, at the FIFA World Club Championship in Japan in December 2005.

(Note from Julian Carosi - further tests have been cancelled and the technology will not be used on the World Cup 2006).

There seem to be a number of problems. Firstly there is a delay of 2-3 seconds before the signal that a ball has crossed the goal line is relayed to the referee.

This would be an unacceptable delay in a match situation. Also the accuracy of the equipment must be 100%. There appear to have been cases where, in pre-tournament demonstrations, the signal has shown that the ball has crossed the line when in fact it is only lying on the line.

Another problem which has emerged is the situation when a ball goes over the crossbar and rests on the top of the goal net. The equipment has wrongly registered this as a goal.
Finally, and perhaps most significantly, there is a problem when there are two balls on the field, one perhaps thrown on too quickly by a ball boy. The equipment apparently crashes for up to 30 seconds and no signal is received by the referee.

There still seem to be problems with the use of goal line technology. Many firms and individuals have attempted to find a solution over the past 10 years but none has been found to be suitable. There would be considerable cost involved in installing the equipment and maintaining it and perhaps it would be needed only once a season, or not at all.

Maybe we should just accept that referees and their assistants get most of the goal line decisions correct and if a wrong decision is made it should be accepted as part of the game. A human error made in a game which is full of other errors by players and coaches as well.

FROSTY PITCH INSPECTIONS

(By Julian Carosi – Contributed by Simeon Potter)

There is no scientific measure that can be used to deem a frosty ice covered field to be safe.

Nevertheless, any experienced Referee will take the following into consideration before making a decision.

• It is the Referee's responsibility to make the decision and nobody else's.

• The whole of the field of play surface MUST be safe. There is a great danger that if 99 percent of the field of play surface is OK, and the game is allowed to be played, players will assume that 100 percent is OK, and play normally, and not compensate for any hard surface areas. In other words, playing on a hard field of play, which is partially 99% OK, is just as dangerous (if not more so) than on a field of play, which is totally hard. Neither game should be played.

• The Referee should not be influenced by the teams' opinion. If an accident happens, it is the Referee who cops it.

• The teams will deny any responsibility! Therefore, when a field of play inspection is carried out, the Referee should not do so in company of team managers or Club Officials, as they will try to influence the Referee's decision.

• When the weather is doubtful, the Referee should aim to arrive at the ground as early as he can to make an inspection. This may allow time for travelling teams to be warned of a cancellation.

• When the weather is doubtful, a check on the local weather forecast can help. For example, although a field of play may be frozen in the early hours of the morning, a prediction of sunshine, will give the Referee a good idea of the possibility that the field may become playable later in the day. If the forecast is for snow or frost or freezing temperatures, then the chances are, that the game will not proceed.

• At lower level football, it can be useful for a local Referee to be contacted, to make an early inspection on behalf of the match Referee who lives some distance away from the ground. This can prevent unnecessary travelling.
When completing the field of play inspection, a good indicator of the suitability of the surface, can be ascertained by inspecting the goalmouth areas and the centre circle area first. These are the areas that get more use, and are more likely to be rutted and hard due to frost.

• When completing the field of play inspection, other areas for close inspection, are places covered in shadow from buildings or trees. They are more likely to be frost bound, rather than those areas basked in sunshine.

• When completing the field of play inspection, if it is not immediately clear that the game cannot be played (i.e. the goalmouth areas are completely solid with frost and the game is definitely cancelled), the whole of the field of play surface MUST must be inspected to eliminate any hidden areas of danger.

• A referee, who is seen to be completing a thorough field of play inspection, will have greater credibility when he decides to call off the game, than a Referee who only spends a few minutes making his inspection.

• The position of the sun and its path as the game progresses must also be taken into consideration. For example, if a field of play is 'just about playable', but the path of the sun means that its rays will disappear behind the trees or over the horizon, then the field of play surface on a cold frosty day, will get worse, not better.

• At local level, if it is clear, that waiting an extra 30 minutes or possibly up to an hour, will allow the sun to melt the frost, then play could be delayed with the agreement of both teams. But this depends very much on the weather forecast, the time of day and the team's agreement. Generally, it is better to make a decision quickly, based on the surface suitability at the time of the scheduled kick-off.

• The referee should wear a set of studded boots when inspecting the field of play, as this will give the best indication of the suitability of the playing surface.

• A surface which does not yield any purchase to studded boots, is dangerous, and the game should not be sanctioned. This includes, any part of the surface that does not yield, no matter how small an area.

• A field of play with hard deep frosted ruts and divots (a legacy of a muddy game played the day before) is less likely to be playable than a completely flat field with only crusty surface-frost to contend with.

• When the Referee has made his decision, it should be communicated to the teams as soon as possible. When a Referee is communicating his decision to the teams, that in his opinion, the field of play is not safe, the decision should be made confidently. If teams suspect any doubt in the Referee's decision, they will try and persuade the Referee to change his mind. In short, when a Referee makes his decision, he should not back down, and he should make it abundantly clear that the decision is his to make, and the game will not be played under his authority.

• The inspection of a field of play covered in frost, and whether to sanction a game or not, is not a difficult decision to make for a Referee. It is fairly obvious to identify dangerous area that could potentially cause an injury. Common sense should be used.

• Young players are more likely to get injured on hard surfaces. Therefore, even greater care must be taken when making a decision to allow the game to be played or not.

• If there is any doubt (no matter how small), then the game must not be played.

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Plum Appointments

Quarter Final Ass Ref
Surrey County Saturday Premier Cup
Whyteleafe vs Walton & Hersham.

Simeon Potter

Super Ref’s

One Super Ref’s for you for the next mag


  • Egham Town v Walton & Hersham (Surrey Senior Cup – round 3) Assistant


    Barrie Gale

  • Monday, January 09, 2006

    Promotion candidates for 2006/07

    Through the County RA, please may I encourage as many referees as possible to go for promotion this coming Season (i.e. year from 01/03/2006) most especially those who are of age to progress.

    I have to say that Surrey is incredibly short of Level 6s, given the number of Level 7s we have and, to cover the Intermediate Cups, I really need more. Please ask our colleagues in the Societies to target all those who could achieve promotion and guide them offering appropriate advice.

    The form to fill in and submit is to be found at http://www.surreyfa.co.uk/refs/r5form04.htm and, for current candidates who wish to remain on the scheme, this must be received by 1st February. Those not on the scheme have until the 1st June but, in order to get watched before the end of this Season, it is preferable to get the form in by 1st February.

    Thanks for your assistance.

    Kind Regards

    David Crick
    Head of Refereeing
    Surrey County FA

    07795 815596 [m]

    Sunday, January 08, 2006

    Sutton United youth side

    Anyone fancy a Sunday 15th Match for one of the Sutton United youth sides (U14’s)?

    I have helped out with this team in the past and they are friendly. Unfortunately I have yet another county appointment.

    Anyone on line now should give me a call.It would be a school in Coulsdon.

    Gissa call

    Mike Taylor

    0208 393 5230

    Friday, January 06, 2006

    Sutton Referees Society meeting

    Sutton Referees Society meeting
    Wednesday 11th January

    The meeting will also incrporate an I.S.T. for the newly the qualified Referees.

    Monday, January 02, 2006

    January 2006 Address from John Kasey

    Dear All

    I must start by wishing you all a successful New Year.

    Last month saw Phil Smith put together a sports quiz that was enjoyed by the membership. As you will see from the minutes the numbers were very low. I accept that it is a busy time of the year but surely those not attending could have recorded their apologies. Anyhow, now I have got that moan off my chest I feel better.

    The County are still arranging Child Protection Workshops and either I can provide dates or these can be obtained from the County website. In addition County RA are collating details of those Referees who have not been appointed to County Cup matches this season. Please let me know if this affects you and I will take forward.

    The format of the January meeting will be an IST for those who passed in early December and CD roms through the Multi Media kit. These evenings have worked well in the past so please make every effort to attend.

    In February I have re-arranged for Ian MacGraw to come along and discuss the differences between Rugby and Football referee training and I am sure this is guaranteed to give us all something to think of.

    See you all on the 11th January.




    John

    PS the 31st December saw Peter Fenn retire from work so feel free to buy him drinks!!